Read your classmates’ posts. A complete assignment includes your written respons

Struggling to meet your deadline? Get your work done on time by experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline

Read your classmates’ posts. A complete assignment includes your written response to at least one essay besides your own–part of your score is based on your reply to at least one of your classmate’s posts. It should be a meaningful reply that continues the discussion, points out something good about the post, and makes a constructive suggestion for improvement.
Miguel Rodriguez Answer
The Straw Man fallacy
Argumentation is the place where ideas come and go as different points of view come together to try and understand one other. During this conversation, the Straw Man fallacy becomes apparent as a weak but dangerous tool that can compromise the objectivity of speech. This fallacy occurs when an opponent’s position is purposefully distorted or misrepresented, weakening or exaggerating the original argument. The Straw Man fallacy, in contrast to straightforward arguments, adds a degree of deceit that demands examination. We examine a real-world example from a political discussion on climate change policy to expose this mistake.
Real life example
Person A stresses that it is our collective duty to address environmental issues and pushes for the implementation of stronger restrictions to lower carbon emissions in a hypothetical political debate. Nevertheless, Person B answers with a misrepresented statement rather than delving into the details of Person A’s claim: “Person A intends to shut down the whole energy business, leaving thousands unemployed. We are unable to finance such drastic actions.”
Evaluation
Misrepresentation: This is the main error in the Straw Man fallacy. Person B purposefully misrepresents Person A’s viewpoint by teasing an excessive demand to close the entire energy sector. This misrepresentation is a purposeful distortion and exaggeration of the original, complex argument, laying the groundwork for future manipulation. (page 33)
Weakened Version: In response, Person B presents a less compelling version of Person A’s case, turning a request for tighter rules into an outlandish suggestion to shut down the entire energy sector. This distortion is deliberate; it makes the point that it will be simpler to refute.
Refutation of Straw Man: After creating the skewed version, Person B goes on to dispute the hysterical assertion that the energy sector will be shut down. Person B may easily skirt Person A’s well-reasoned case for more stringent laws thanks to this cunning maneuver. The reply focuses on the skewed version while conveniently avoiding a meaningful discussion of Person A’s actual points.
Contrast with Other Fallacies
To fully see how the Straw Man fallacy differs from other common fallacies in arguing, a careful comparison with the following fallacies is necessary:
Ad Hominem: Straw Man concentrates on distorting the argument itself, in contrast to Ad Hominem, which targets the speaker rather than the argument. It’s more important to twist their beliefs than to discredit the person. (page 33)
Red Herring: While Straw Man uses a more devious tactic by twisting the opponent’s position to avoid directly addressing the argument, Red Herring focuses on drawing attention away from the main point. The argument itself is where the divergence takes place.
False Dilemma: A false dilemma necessitates choosing between two extremes and offers few solutions. By presenting a pseudo-dilemma and fabricating the opponent’s stance, on the other hand, the Straw Man undermines meaningful conversation by simplifying the argument. (page 37)
The Straw Man fallacy highlights the possible dangers of lying in an argument, acting as a cautionary tale in the complex web of political discourse. People’s purposeful misrepresentation enables them to counter a watered-down version of an opponent’s case without having to engage in meaningful discourse. It is crucial to identify and debunk the straw man fallacy to promote thoughtful and intellectually honest dialogue. By doing this, we make room for productive discussions that support informed decision-making in society and guarantee that the interchange of ideas stays a source of illumination rather than a place for cunning double- dealing.

Struggling to meet your deadline? Get your work done on time by experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline